Skip to main content
Lynn Solutions

Financial systems for businesses where the same accounting problem keeps coming back

Invoices that never get sent. Commission that's late because accounting missed a step again. A customer who won't pay because one detail on the invoice was wrong, so you wait another payment cycle. A report nobody trusts until the owner checks it personally.

Your bookkeeper fixes it, and next month it happens again. If this is you, your problem extends beyond bookkeeping. It's a process problem.

Financial Systems is the work of finding where that process breaks, cutting out the steps your team repeats for no reason, automating the repeatable parts where it's safe, and writing it all down so one person isn't the system anymore. We do this for clients anywhere in the United States.

Which service do you actually need?

These four get confused a lot. They're different problems.

Your past books are wrong. Accounts aren't reconciled, months are behind, or nobody trusts the numbers. That's bookkeeping cleanup.

You need someone to own the accounting every month. Transactions, reconciliations, close, reports. That's monthly bookkeeping.

Your numbers are good, and you need help reading them and deciding what to do. That's CFO and advisory.

The same problem keeps happening. The same invoice mistake, the same late payment, the same step only one person knows how to do. That's Financial Systems.

Plenty of businesses need more than one of these, and the order matters a lot. If your books aren't reconciling, building new systems on top of them will only lead to more cleanup in the future.

How one company went from 45 days to get paid to 2

I have a client whose sales reps do in-home consultations every day, seven days a week. They close about five sales a day.

Before I came on, the invoicing process was convoluted. This company has partnerships with several major suppliers, and each supplier has its own data entry and reporting standards. A single job often sells items from different suppliers. It could be a bathtub, tile, and blinds, each from a different company, each with its own standard. So the rep would get a signed contract, and then report the sale in a CRM for eachsupplier on that job. It's ridiculous, I know, but it's what they had to do.

That led to delay. The rep would sell the job, call their manager, and give the numbers. The manager would enter the numbers, then send them over to accounting and compliance to double-check. Sometimes legal got involved too, depending on the scope of work. All of those boxes had to be checked before the customer could receive their initial invoice. On a normal sale, the best-case scenario was that the customer got their invoice a whole day later, but in reality, it usually was two or three days after signing. Also, the office staff had at least two hours of work to input and check per sale.

This led to delays in collections, and some invoices never got sent even though the work was being done. Before I took over, residential customers were averaging about 45 days to pay.

What I built

We know what compliance thresholds we're allowed to be within. We know what metrics the job has to be sold at. So why make the business jump through hoops when a job that's inside those thresholds could just be approved automatically? So I built a system that does just that. If the sale needs to be double-checked because something is off, it now immediately gets flagged and goes to the person who needs eyes on it.

I connected their CRMs, so instead of the rep filling out the same data in three or four places, they fill out one simple form I created. That form triggers the financial automations I built, which:

  • handle the data entry into each supplier's CRM
  • feed the sales tracker for commission payouts
  • support job costing for management
  • give the accounting team the information they need
  • give the compliance team the critical information they need
  • ping the owner on Slack whenever a new deal is sold, so they can see right away how every other department is handling it

Now, instead of asking four managers how the business is doing, the owner gets what they need automatically every time a sale closes. No more useless meetings, no more bureaucracy waiting for departments to approve, and no more waiting for money to hit the bank. Sales reps leave happy and ready for the next job, knowing their commission gets paid on time and won't slip a cycle because accounting missed a step again.

What it looks like now

It went from all the corporate slowdown mumbo jumbo to this: a sale gets closed, and before the rep can even put away the iPad from getting the signature, the customer's invoice has landed and they can pay right there on the spot. It's natural. The whole business moves faster because of it.

Every department is happier with this setup because they get to spend their time on more interesting work instead of verifying the right number hit the right box for compliance.

I'm proud to say that in the last six months, this system has handled more than 700 invoices for this one client. Not one of them has been missed, and based on my records, not one has needed to be corrected for an error. Average time to get paid went from about 45 days to about 2. At any given time, that's roughly $50,000 less sitting in receivables. My client gets to operate with that money instead of operating as a bank for their customers.

How I find these problems

Most people don't come to me looking for help with financial systems. Most people don't realize they have these issues. Most businesses I talk to are putting out fires daily, and it's the norm for them. It doesn't have to be.

With my recurring clients, once I'm acquainted with the books, I get a feel for what's working and what isn't. Then I ask the owner straight up:

"Tell me about the pain points on your team as it pertains to accounting. What do people complain about? What do they not like?"

And I listen. Most businesses have things that come to mind immediately. Those are the things I look at to see if I can build a system to help.

I'm passionate about this because I've seen companies that ignore systems-level issues lose good people and make less money than they should. The accounting side is something you have to get right. It's a core function of the business. A lot of the time, these issues feel really big. They put strain on the team and cause burnout. People don't realize you can hire someone to take what feels complex and greatly simplify it for you and your team.

If you're not a client yet, that question is where a Fit Call starts.

When the owner is the system

Same thing happened with another client, a commercial contractor working with 26 other companies. Each of those companies has its own AP department and its own compliance requirements, and each has its own process for how invoices need to be sent. If you miss a detail, they won't pay, and you wait until the next payment cycle.

The owner somehow kept all of those SOPs in his brain, and everyone else on the team struggled to keep up.

I sat him down, interviewed him about it, and wrote down everything he said. Then I reached out to all 26 companies, got their AP teams involved, and wrote down each process. I turned that into one master document. Now anyone on the team can pick it up and follow the right process without depending on the owner's memory. I was also able to greatly simplify the workflow for not just them, but some other AP departments. I eliminate redundancy where I can. Now everyone is happier, and money moves on time.

The owner is no longer involved in that side of the business. He's cut the amount of time he spends managing that process in half, spends more time with his family, and is at peace knowing his managers are running the right system.

What I will and won't automate

I build these things so you can spend your time running your business, not dealing with data entry and complex systems.

I keep a human in the loop on all of them, too. Any one of these automations could run without someone staying on top of it. But most clients don't want anything automatically writing to their accounting software, and that's okay. Normally I manage the automations, or I train others on your team to manage them, and I spend my time maintaining the workflows and handling the code.

Here's where I draw the line. If a rule is repeatable and everyone agrees on it, like a compliance threshold, it can be automated. If a bad input could reach a customer or land in your books, a person looks at it first, period.

And I won't automate a process that's broken. A client once asked me to build automations so management could review profitability reports and job costing. Once I started, I realized their accounting team wasn't following correct procedures. One example: they were changing invoice dates to match the date the cash was received.

That sounds harmless, but it isn't. Once the invoice date moves, you lose the record of when you actually billed. You can't measure how long customers take to pay. Revenue lands in the wrong period. And job numbers get harder to read over time because the timing underneath them is wrong. There's no way to tell if your job costing is working if you are changing invoice dates.

So I stopped the automation work. I fixed the process first, trained management on it, watched the audit log, corrected it every time it drifted, and kept management accountable for the new procedure. Automating the old way would have just given them wrong reports faster.

What the work actually looks like

There's no trademarked method. It usually goes like this.

  1. Listen. What do people complain about? What keeps going wrong?
  2. Check the accounting underneath it. If the books don't reconcile, or the team isn't following correct procedures, that gets fixed first.
  3. Trace the process. Where it starts (a signed contract, a finished job, a payment), every person and system it passes through, and where it breaks or sits and waits.
  4. Pick the source of truth. One place is the official answer for each number.
  5. Write the rules and the exceptions. What goes through on its own, what needs a person, and what happens when two systems disagree.
  6. Simplify what people have to enter. One form instead of four CRMs.
  7. Automate the repeatable parts where it's safe, with a person reviewing anything that reaches a customer or your books.
  8. Train the team and management.
  9. Watch it. Processes drift. I check the logs and correct it.
  10. Document it, so one person is no longer the system.

Who this is for, and who it isn't

This is a good fit if:

  • The same mistake shows up every month, and the fix never sticks.
  • The owner is the process. If they're out for a week, invoices stall.
  • Your team types the same information into two, three, or four systems.
  • Invoices go out late, or not at all, because nobody owns the step between the sale and the bill.
  • Your CRM, your sales tracker, and your accounting don't agree with each other.
  • Your people complain about accounting steps that feel pointless.
  • You want to know how the business is doing without asking four managers.

This is not a fit if:

  • You want an ERP selected or implemented.
  • You want custom software or an app built from scratch.
  • You want IT support, or someone to troubleshoot QuickBooks when it freezes.
  • You want accounting that runs itself with nobody reviewing it.
  • You want automation on top of books that don't reconcile. We'll clean them up first, or we're not the right fit.

If it's not a fit, I'll point you in the right direction.

Frequently asked questions

Is this bookkeeping?
No. Bookkeeping records what happened and closes the month. Financial Systems changes the process that produces those records, so the same problem stops coming back. A lot of clients have both. That's usually how I find these problems in the first place.
Do I need cleanup first?
If your books don't reconcile, or your team isn't following correct accounting procedures, yes. I've stopped automation work partway through a project to fix the process underneath it. The system is only as good as the books it feeds.
Do I have to replace QuickBooks?
No. I work with the software you already use. The point is to get your systems agreeing with each other and cut the retyping, not to sell you new software.
Will you automate parts of the process?
Yes, where it's safe. I've connected CRMs, built intake forms, fed commission trackers and job costing, and set up notifications so an owner sees each sale the moment it closes. Anything that could reach a customer or your books gets reviewed by a person. Most clients don't want anything writing to their accounting software automatically, and that's okay.
Will you work with my current bookkeeper or accounting team?
Yes. In the invoicing example above, the accounting team was already in place. They stopped chasing numbers and verifying boxes and started getting what they needed as soon as a sale closed. The work changes what your people have to do and trains them on it. It doesn't replace them.
Do you work with businesses outside Washington?
Yes. We're headquartered in Tacoma, and Financial Systems work is done remotely for clients anywhere in the United States. I need access to the systems involved and time with the people who use them.
What do I have when it's finished?
A process your team can run without the owner holding it in their head. Depending on the problem, that's a written procedure or master document, the forms and automations built on the software you already use, a team that's been trained on it, and clear rules for what a person reviews. Some clients have me keep managing the automations. Others have their own people take them over.

Tell me what keeps going wrong

Book a Fit Call and bring the thing your team complains about most. If Financial Systems isn't what you need, I'll tell you and point you in the right direction.